sammccall added a comment.

In D77335#1958106 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D77335#1958106>, @efriedma wrote:

> If you're going to add code to check for it, we might as well add testcases 
> for ridiculous sizes, like `(__int128_t)1 << 100`.


Done. Looks like this was previously an assertion failure.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D77335/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D77335



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to