I have not found which of the few commits on Friday having to do with
template-ids is responsible, but this now produces a crash (trace is below):
struct A;
struct B : A<int> {};
Richard, would you take a look?
Thanks,
Hubert Tong
<stdin>:2:12: error: unknown template name 'A'
struct B : A<int> {};
^
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash
backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script.
Stack dump:
0. Program arguments: /build/bin/clang++ -cc1 -xc++ -
1. <stdin>:2:19: current parser token '{'
2. <stdin>:2:1: parsing struct/union/class body 'B'
#0 0x00003fffb2016418 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&)
(/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git+0x206418)
#1 0x00003fffb2016540 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*)
(/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git+0x206540)
#2 0x00003fffb2013b38 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers()
(/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git+0x203b38)
#3 0x00003fffb2013d2c SignalHandler(int)
(/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git+0x203d2c)
#4 0x00003fffb4570478 0x478 clang::Sema::ActOnBaseSpecifier(clang::Decl*,
clang::SourceRange, clang::ParsedAttributes&, bool, clang::AccessSpecifier,
clang::OpaquePtr<clang::QualType>, clang::SourceLocation,
clang::SourceLocation)
#5 0x00003fffb4570478
#6 0x00003fffb4570478 clang::Parser::ParseBaseSpecifier(clang::Decl*)
(+0x478)
#7 0x0000001c00000017
#8 0x00003fffad949354 clang::Parser::ParseBaseClause(clang::Decl*)
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangSema.so.11git+0x469354)
#9 0x00003fffae1b3368
clang::Parser::ParseCXXMemberSpecification(clang::SourceLocation,
clang::SourceLocation, clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&, unsigned
int, clang::Decl*) (/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x73368)
#10 0x00003fffae1b3668
clang::Parser::ParseClassSpecifier(clang::tok::TokenKind,
clang::SourceLocation, clang::DeclSpec&, clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo
const&, clang::AccessSpecifier, bool, clang::Parser::DeclSpecContext,
clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&)
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x73668)
#11 0x00003fffae1b884c
clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationSpecifiers(clang::DeclSpec&,
clang::Parser::ParsedTemplateInfo const&, clang::AccessSpecifier,
clang::Parser::DeclSpecContext, clang::Parser::LateParsedAttrList*)
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x7884c)
#12 0x00003fffae1ba2ac
clang::Parser::ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&,
clang::ParsingDeclSpec&, clang::AccessSpecifier)
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x7a2ac)
#13 0x00003fffae19b4f0
clang::Parser::ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&,
clang::ParsingDeclSpec*, clang::AccessSpecifier) (.part.221)
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x5b4f0)
#14 0x00003fffae248894
clang::Parser::ParseExternalDeclaration(clang::Parser::ParsedAttributesWithRange&,
clang::ParsingDeclSpec*)
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x108894)
#15 0x00003fffae249174
clang::Parser::ParseTopLevelDecl(clang::OpaquePtr<clang::DeclGroupRef>&,
bool) (/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x109174)
#16 0x00003fffae24d880 clang::ParseAST(clang::Sema&, bool, bool)
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x10d880)
#17 0x00003fffae24f00c clang::ASTFrontendAction::ExecuteAction()
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x10f00c)
#18 0x00003fffae1743a8 clang::FrontendAction::Execute()
(/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git+0x343a8)
#19 0x00003fffb07bc5c0
clang::CompilerInstance::ExecuteAction(clang::FrontendAction&)
(/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontend.so.11git+0x11c5c0)
#20 0x00003fffb07c100c
clang::ExecuteCompilerInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*)
(/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontend.so.11git+0x12100c)
#21 0x00003fffb076d900 cc1_main(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, char const*,
void*) (/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontend.so.11git+0xcd900)
#22 0x00003fffb06749dc ExecuteCC1Tool(llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char const*>&)
(/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontendTool.so.11git+0x49dc)
#23 0x000000001001635c main (/build/bin/clang+++0x1001635c)
#24 0x000000001000f6b8 generic_start_main.isra.0
(/build/bin/clang+++0x1000f6b8)
#25 0x000000001000cdcc __libc_start_main (/build/bin/clang+++0x1000cdcc)
/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git(_ZN4llvm3sys15PrintStackTraceERNS_11raw_ostreamE+0x38)[0x3fffb2016418]
/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git(+0x206540)[0x3fffb2016540]
/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git(_ZN4llvm3sys17RunSignalHandlersEv+0x78)[0x3fffb2013b38]
/build/bin/../lib/libLLVMSupport.so.11git(+0x203d2c)[0x3fffb2013d2c]
[0x3fffb4570478]
[0x1c00000017]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangSema.so.11git(_ZN5clang4Sema18ActOnBaseSpecifierEPNS_4DeclENS_11SourceRangeERNS_16ParsedAttributesEbNS_15AccessSpecifierENS_9OpaquePtrINS_8QualTypeEEENS_14SourceLocationESA_+0x234)[0x3fffad949354]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser18ParseBaseSpecifierEPNS_4DeclE+0x1b8)[0x3fffae1b3368]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser15ParseBaseClauseEPNS_4DeclE+0x78)[0x3fffae1b3668]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser27ParseCXXMemberSpecificationENS_14SourceLocationES1_RNS0_25ParsedAttributesWithRangeEjPNS_4DeclE+0x7cc)[0x3fffae1b884c]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser19ParseClassSpecifierENS_3tok9TokenKindENS_14SourceLocationERNS_8DeclSpecERKNS0_18ParsedTemplateInfoENS_15AccessSpecifierEbNS0_15DeclSpecContextERNS0_25ParsedAttributesWithRangeE+0x15ec)[0x3fffae1ba2ac]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser26ParseDeclarationSpecifiersERNS_8DeclSpecERKNS0_18ParsedTemplateInfoENS_15AccessSpecifierENS0_15DeclSpecContextEPNS0_18LateParsedAttrListE+0xea0)[0x3fffae19b4f0]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser30ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternalERNS0_25ParsedAttributesWithRangeERNS_15ParsingDeclSpecENS_15AccessSpecifierE+0x94)[0x3fffae248894]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(+0x109174)[0x3fffae249174]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser24ParseExternalDeclarationERNS0_25ParsedAttributesWithRangeEPNS_15ParsingDeclSpecE+0x710)[0x3fffae24d880]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang6Parser17ParseTopLevelDeclERNS_9OpaquePtrINS_12DeclGroupRefEEEb+0x12c)[0x3fffae24f00c]
/build/bin/../lib/../lib/libclangParse.so.11git(_ZN5clang8ParseASTERNS_4SemaEbb+0x2c8)[0x3fffae1743a8]
/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontend.so.11git(_ZN5clang17ASTFrontendAction13ExecuteActionEv+0x70)[0x3fffb07bc5c0]
/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontend.so.11git(_ZN5clang14FrontendAction7ExecuteEv+0x10c)[0x3fffb07c100c]
/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontend.so.11git(_ZN5clang16CompilerInstance13ExecuteActionERNS_14FrontendActionE+0x240)[0x3fffb076d900]
/build/bin/../lib/libclangFrontendTool.so.11git(_ZN5clang25ExecuteCompilerInvocationEPNS_16CompilerInstanceE+0xb1c)[0x3fffb06749dc]
/build/bin/clang++(_Z8cc1_mainN4llvm8ArrayRefIPKcEES2_Pv+0x136c)[0x1001635c]
/build/bin/clang++[0x1000f6b8]
/build/bin/clang++(main+0xe4c)[0x1000cdcc]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x25100)[0x3fffaff55100]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc4)[0x3fffaff552f4]
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:13 AM Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Author: Richard Smith
> Date: 2020-03-27T21:07:06-07:00
> New Revision: 499b2a8d63ca9b319ce3aae462029f37ce7d96dd
>
> URL:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/499b2a8d63ca9b319ce3aae462029f37ce7d96dd
> DIFF:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/499b2a8d63ca9b319ce3aae462029f37ce7d96dd.diff
>
> LOG: PR45294: Fix handling of assumed template names looked up in the
> lexical
> scope.
>
> There are a few contexts in which we assume a name is a template name;
> if such a context is one where we should perform an unqualified lookup,
> and lookup finds nothing, we would form a dependent template name even
> if the name is not dependent. This happens in particular for the lookup
> of a pseudo-destructor.
>
> In passing, rename ActOnDependentTemplateName to just ActOnTemplateName
> given that we apply it for non-dependent template names too.
>
> Added:
>
>
> Modified:
> clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
> clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
> clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp
> clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
> clang/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
> clang/test/SemaCXX/literal-operators.cpp
> clang/test/SemaCXX/pseudo-destructors.cpp
> clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
>
> Removed:
>
>
>
>
> ################################################################################
> diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
> b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
> index d2aa2902bb2a..b48f92f38939 100644
> --- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
> +++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
> @@ -4919,6 +4919,9 @@ def err_template_kw_refers_to_non_template : Error<
> "%0 following the 'template' keyword does not refer to a template">;
> def note_template_kw_refers_to_non_template : Note<
> "declared as a non-template here">;
> +def err_template_kw_refers_to_dependent_non_template : Error<
> + "%0%select{| following the 'template' keyword}1 "
> + "cannot refer to a dependent template">;
> def err_template_kw_refers_to_class_template : Error<
> "'%0%1' instantiated to a class template, not a function template">;
> def note_referenced_class_template : Note<
>
> diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
> b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
> index 985bcf689d21..761fad9456be 100644
> --- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
> +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp
> @@ -1773,6 +1773,12 @@ Parser::ParseCXXPseudoDestructor(Expr *Base,
> SourceLocation OpLoc,
>
> // If there is a '<', the second type name is a template-id. Parse
> // it as such.
> + //
> + // FIXME: This is not a context in which a '<' is assumed to start a
> template
> + // argument list. This affects examples such as
> + // void f(auto *p) { p->~X<int>(); }
> + // ... but there's no ambiguity, and nowhere to write 'template' in
> such an
> + // example, so we accept it anyway.
> if (Tok.is(tok::less) &&
> ParseUnqualifiedIdTemplateId(
> SS, ObjectType, Base && Base->containsErrors(),
> SourceLocation(),
>
> diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp
> index 47b5de320ebf..a33e40b8768d 100644
> --- a/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp
> +++ b/clang/lib/Parse/Parser.cpp
> @@ -1878,11 +1878,7 @@ bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken() {
> Tok.getLocation());
> } else if (Tok.is(tok::annot_template_id)) {
> TemplateIdAnnotation *TemplateId = takeTemplateIdAnnotation(Tok);
> - if (TemplateId->isInvalid())
> - return true;
> - if (TemplateId->Kind != TNK_Type_template &&
> - TemplateId->Kind != TNK_Dependent_template_name &&
> - TemplateId->Kind != TNK_Undeclared_template) {
> + if (!TemplateId->mightBeType()) {
> Diag(Tok, diag::err_typename_refers_to_non_type_template)
> << Tok.getAnnotationRange();
> return true;
> @@ -1891,14 +1887,13 @@ bool Parser::TryAnnotateTypeOrScopeToken() {
> ASTTemplateArgsPtr TemplateArgsPtr(TemplateId->getTemplateArgs(),
> TemplateId->NumArgs);
>
> - Ty = Actions.ActOnTypenameType(getCurScope(), TypenameLoc, SS,
> - TemplateId->TemplateKWLoc,
> - TemplateId->Template,
> - TemplateId->Name,
> - TemplateId->TemplateNameLoc,
> - TemplateId->LAngleLoc,
> - TemplateArgsPtr,
> - TemplateId->RAngleLoc);
> + Ty = TemplateId->isInvalid()
> + ? TypeError()
> + : Actions.ActOnTypenameType(
> + getCurScope(), TypenameLoc, SS,
> TemplateId->TemplateKWLoc,
> + TemplateId->Template, TemplateId->Name,
> + TemplateId->TemplateNameLoc, TemplateId->LAngleLoc,
> + TemplateArgsPtr, TemplateId->RAngleLoc);
> } else {
> Diag(Tok, diag::err_expected_type_name_after_typename)
> << SS.getRange();
>
> diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
> b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
> index 74d1fbe2ec77..1e2ebc5037bc 100755
> --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
> +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
> @@ -377,6 +377,9 @@ bool Sema::LookupTemplateName(LookupResult &Found,
> if (ATK)
> *ATK = AssumedTemplateKind::None;
>
> + if (SS.isInvalid())
> + return true;
> +
> Found.setTemplateNameLookup(true);
>
> // Determine where to perform name lookup
> @@ -386,7 +389,7 @@ bool Sema::LookupTemplateName(LookupResult &Found,
> if (!ObjectType.isNull()) {
> // This nested-name-specifier occurs in a member access expression,
> e.g.,
> // x->B::f, and we are looking into the type of the object.
> - assert(!SS.isSet() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot
> coexist");
> + assert(SS.isEmpty() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot
> coexist");
> LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType);
> IsDependent = !LookupCtx && ObjectType->isDependentType();
> assert((IsDependent || !ObjectType->isIncompleteType() ||
> @@ -412,11 +415,11 @@ bool Sema::LookupTemplateName(LookupResult &Found,
> Found.clear();
> return false;
> }
> - } else if (SS.isSet()) {
> + } else if (SS.isNotEmpty()) {
> // This nested-name-specifier occurs after another
> nested-name-specifier,
> // so long into the context associated with the prior
> nested-name-specifier.
> LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
> - IsDependent = !LookupCtx;
> + IsDependent = !LookupCtx && isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS);
>
> // The declaration context must be complete.
> if (LookupCtx && RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS, LookupCtx))
> @@ -443,7 +446,7 @@ bool Sema::LookupTemplateName(LookupResult &Found,
> IsDependent |= Found.wasNotFoundInCurrentInstantiation();
> }
>
> - if (!SS.isSet() && (ObjectType.isNull() || Found.empty())) {
> + if (SS.isEmpty() && (ObjectType.isNull() || Found.empty())) {
> // C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p1:
> // In a class member access expression (5.2.5), if the . or ->
> token is
> // immediately followed by an identifier followed by a <, the
> @@ -470,7 +473,7 @@ bool Sema::LookupTemplateName(LookupResult &Found,
> if (Found.isAmbiguous())
> return false;
>
> - if (ATK && !SS.isSet() && ObjectType.isNull() &&
> TemplateKWLoc.isInvalid()) {
> + if (ATK && SS.isEmpty() && ObjectType.isNull() &&
> TemplateKWLoc.isInvalid()) {
> // C++2a [temp.names]p2:
> // A name is also considered to refer to a template if it is an
> // unqualified-id followed by a < and name lookup finds either one
> or more
> @@ -3470,6 +3473,10 @@ QualType Sema::CheckTemplateIdType(TemplateName
> Name,
>
> DTN->getIdentifier(),
> TemplateArgs);
>
> + if (Name.getAsAssumedTemplateName() &&
> + resolveAssumedTemplateNameAsType(/*Scope*/nullptr, Name,
> TemplateLoc))
> + return QualType();
> +
> TemplateDecl *Template = Name.getAsTemplateDecl();
> if (!Template || isa<FunctionTemplateDecl>(Template) ||
> isa<VarTemplateDecl>(Template) || isa<ConceptDecl>(Template)) {
> @@ -4652,95 +4659,111 @@ TemplateNameKind Sema::ActOnTemplateName(Scope *S,
> diag::ext_template_outside_of_template)
> << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(TemplateKWLoc);
>
> + if (SS.isInvalid())
> + return TNK_Non_template;
> +
> + // Figure out where isTemplateName is going to look.
> DeclContext *LookupCtx = nullptr;
> - if (SS.isSet())
> + if (SS.isNotEmpty())
> LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
> - if (!LookupCtx && ObjectType)
> - LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType.get());
> - if (LookupCtx) {
> - // C++0x [temp.names]p5:
> - // If a name prefixed by the keyword template is not the name of
> - // a template, the program is ill-formed. [Note: the keyword
> - // template may not be applied to non-template members of class
> - // templates. -end note ] [ Note: as is the case with the
> - // typename prefix, the template prefix is allowed in cases
> - // where it is not strictly necessary; i.e., when the
> - // nested-name-specifier or the expression on the left of the ->
> - // or . is not dependent on a template-parameter, or the use
> - // does not appear in the scope of a template. -end note]
> - //
> - // Note: C++03 was more strict here, because it banned the use of
> - // the "template" keyword prior to a template-name that was not a
> - // dependent name. C++ DR468 relaxed this requirement (the
> - // "template" keyword is now permitted). We follow the C++0x
> - // rules, even in C++03 mode with a warning, retroactively applying
> the DR.
> - bool MemberOfUnknownSpecialization;
> - TemplateNameKind TNK = isTemplateName(S, SS, TemplateKWLoc.isValid(),
> Name,
> - ObjectType, EnteringContext,
> Result,
> - MemberOfUnknownSpecialization);
> - if (TNK == TNK_Non_template && MemberOfUnknownSpecialization) {
> - // This is a dependent template. Handle it below.
> - } else if (TNK == TNK_Non_template) {
> - // Do the lookup again to determine if this is a "nothing found"
> case or
> - // a "not a template" case. FIXME: Refactor isTemplateName so we
> don't
> - // need to do this.
> - DeclarationNameInfo DNI = GetNameFromUnqualifiedId(Name);
> - LookupResult R(*this, DNI.getName(), Name.getBeginLoc(),
> - LookupOrdinaryName);
> - bool MOUS;
> - if (!LookupTemplateName(R, S, SS, ObjectType.get(), EnteringContext,
> - MOUS, TemplateKWLoc) && !R.isAmbiguous())
> + else if (ObjectType)
> + LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(GetTypeFromParser(ObjectType));
> +
> + // C++0x [temp.names]p5:
> + // If a name prefixed by the keyword template is not the name of
> + // a template, the program is ill-formed. [Note: the keyword
> + // template may not be applied to non-template members of class
> + // templates. -end note ] [ Note: as is the case with the
> + // typename prefix, the template prefix is allowed in cases
> + // where it is not strictly necessary; i.e., when the
> + // nested-name-specifier or the expression on the left of the ->
> + // or . is not dependent on a template-parameter, or the use
> + // does not appear in the scope of a template. -end note]
> + //
> + // Note: C++03 was more strict here, because it banned the use of
> + // the "template" keyword prior to a template-name that was not a
> + // dependent name. C++ DR468 relaxed this requirement (the
> + // "template" keyword is now permitted). We follow the C++0x
> + // rules, even in C++03 mode with a warning, retroactively applying the
> DR.
> + bool MemberOfUnknownSpecialization;
> + TemplateNameKind TNK = isTemplateName(S, SS, TemplateKWLoc.isValid(),
> Name,
> + ObjectType, EnteringContext,
> Result,
> + MemberOfUnknownSpecialization);
> + if (TNK != TNK_Non_template) {
> + // We resolved this to a (non-dependent) template name. Return it.
> + auto *LookupRD = dyn_cast_or_null<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx);
> + if (!AllowInjectedClassName && SS.isNotEmpty() && LookupRD &&
> + Name.getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier &&
> + Name.Identifier && LookupRD->getIdentifier() == Name.Identifier) {
> + // C++14 [class.qual]p2:
> + // In a lookup in which function names are not ignored and the
> + // nested-name-specifier nominates a class C, if the name
> specified
> + // [...] is the injected-class-name of C, [...] the name is
> instead
> + // considered to name the constructor
> + //
> + // We don't get here if naming the constructor would be valid, so we
> + // just reject immediately and recover by treating the
> + // injected-class-name as naming the template.
> + Diag(Name.getBeginLoc(),
> + diag::ext_out_of_line_qualified_id_type_names_constructor)
> + << Name.Identifier
> + << 0 /*injected-class-name used as template name*/
> + << TemplateKWLoc.isValid();
> + }
> + return TNK;
> + }
> +
> + if (!MemberOfUnknownSpecialization) {
> + // Didn't find a template name, and the lookup wasn't dependent.
> + // Do the lookup again to determine if this is a "nothing found" case
> or
> + // a "not a template" case. FIXME: Refactor isTemplateName so we don't
> + // need to do this.
> + DeclarationNameInfo DNI = GetNameFromUnqualifiedId(Name);
> + LookupResult R(*this, DNI.getName(), Name.getBeginLoc(),
> + LookupOrdinaryName);
> + bool MOUS;
> + // FIXME: If LookupTemplateName fails here, we'll have produced its
> + // diagnostics twice.
> + if (!LookupTemplateName(R, S, SS, ObjectType.get(), EnteringContext,
> + MOUS, TemplateKWLoc) && !R.isAmbiguous()) {
> + if (LookupCtx)
> Diag(Name.getBeginLoc(), diag::err_no_member)
> << DNI.getName() << LookupCtx << SS.getRange();
> - return TNK_Non_template;
> - } else {
> - // We found something; return it.
> - auto *LookupRD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx);
> - if (!AllowInjectedClassName && SS.isSet() && LookupRD &&
> - Name.getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier &&
> - Name.Identifier && LookupRD->getIdentifier() ==
> Name.Identifier) {
> - // C++14 [class.qual]p2:
> - // In a lookup in which function names are not ignored and the
> - // nested-name-specifier nominates a class C, if the name
> specified
> - // [...] is the injected-class-name of C, [...] the name is
> instead
> - // considered to name the constructor
> - //
> - // We don't get here if naming the constructor would be valid, so
> we
> - // just reject immediately and recover by treating the
> - // injected-class-name as naming the template.
> - Diag(Name.getBeginLoc(),
> - diag::ext_out_of_line_qualified_id_type_names_constructor)
> - << Name.Identifier
> - << 0 /*injected-class-name used as template name*/
> - << 1 /*'template' keyword was used*/;
> - }
> - return TNK;
> + else
> + Diag(Name.getBeginLoc(), diag::err_undeclared_use)
> + << DNI.getName() << SS.getRange();
> }
> + return TNK_Non_template;
> }
>
> NestedNameSpecifier *Qualifier = SS.getScopeRep();
>
> switch (Name.getKind()) {
> case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier:
> - Result = TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier,
> -
> Name.Identifier));
> + Result = TemplateTy::make(
> + Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier, Name.Identifier));
> return TNK_Dependent_template_name;
>
> case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
> - Result = TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier,
> -
> Name.OperatorFunctionId.Operator));
> + Result = TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(
> + Qualifier, Name.OperatorFunctionId.Operator));
> return TNK_Function_template;
>
> case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
> - llvm_unreachable("literal operator id cannot have a dependent scope");
> + // This is a kind of template name, but can never occur in a dependent
> + // scope (literal operators can only be declared at namespace scope).
> + break;
>
> default:
> break;
> }
>
> - Diag(Name.getBeginLoc(), diag::err_template_kw_refers_to_non_template)
> + // This name cannot possibly name a dependent template. Diagnose this
> now
> + // rather than building a dependent template name that can never be
> valid.
> + Diag(Name.getBeginLoc(),
> + diag::err_template_kw_refers_to_dependent_non_template)
> << GetNameFromUnqualifiedId(Name).getName() << Name.getSourceRange()
> - << TemplateKWLoc;
> + << TemplateKWLoc.isValid() << TemplateKWLoc;
> return TNK_Non_template;
> }
>
>
> diff --git a/clang/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
> b/clang/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
> index ba1cce419a46..dbf3a3e70bb0 100644
> --- a/clang/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
> +++ b/clang/test/Parser/cxx-decl.cpp
> @@ -240,8 +240,7 @@ namespace PR17255 {
> void foo() {
> typename A::template B<> c; // expected-error {{use of undeclared
> identifier 'A'}}
> #if __cplusplus <= 199711L
> - // expected-error@-2 {{'typename' occurs outside of a template}}
> - // expected-error@-3 {{'template' keyword outside of a template}}
> + // expected-error@-2 {{'template' keyword outside of a template}}
> #endif
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/literal-operators.cpp
> b/clang/test/SemaCXX/literal-operators.cpp
> index 304aa7cab7f3..834d5ec7923e 100644
> --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/literal-operators.cpp
> +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/literal-operators.cpp
> @@ -47,3 +47,7 @@ template <unsigned long long...> void operator ""
> _invalid(); // expected-error
> _Complex float operator""if(long double); // expected-warning {{reserved}}
> _Complex float test_if_1() { return 2.0f + 1.5if; };
> void test_if_2() { "foo"if; } // expected-error {{no matching literal
> operator for call to 'operator""if'}}
> +
> +template<typename T> void dependent_member_template() {
> + T().template operator""_foo<int>(); // expected-error
> {{'operator""_foo' following the 'template' keyword cannot refer to a
> dependent template}}
> +}
>
> diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/pseudo-destructors.cpp
> b/clang/test/SemaCXX/pseudo-destructors.cpp
> index b71b523de683..292324893dd0 100644
> --- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/pseudo-destructors.cpp
> +++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/pseudo-destructors.cpp
> @@ -119,3 +119,54 @@ void test2(Foo d) {
> d.~Derived(); // expected-error {{member reference type
> 'dotPointerAccess::Foo' (aka 'dotPointerAccess::Derived *') is a pointer;
> did you mean to use '->'}}
> }
> }
> +
> +int pr45294 = 1 .~undeclared_tempate_name<>(); // expected-error {{use of
> undeclared 'undeclared_tempate_name'}}
> +
> +namespace TwoPhaseLookup {
> + namespace NonTemplate {
> + struct Y {};
> + using G = Y;
> + template<typename T> void f(T *p) { p->~G(); } // expected-error {{no
> member named '~Y'}}
> + void h1(Y *p) { p->~G(); }
> + void h2(Y *p) { f(p); }
> + namespace N { struct G{}; }
> + void h3(N::G *p) { p->~G(); }
> + void h4(N::G *p) { f(p); } // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
> + }
> +
> + namespace NonTemplateUndeclared {
> + struct Y {};
> + template<typename T> void f(T *p) { p->~G(); } // expected-error
> {{undeclared identifier 'G' in destructor name}}
> + using G = Y;
> + void h1(Y *p) { p->~G(); }
> + void h2(Y *p) { f(p); } // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
> + namespace N { struct G{}; }
> + void h3(N::G *p) { p->~G(); }
> + void h4(N::G *p) { f(p); }
> + }
> +
> + namespace Template {
> + template<typename T> struct Y {};
> + template<class U> using G = Y<U>;
> + template<typename T> void f(T *p) { p->~G<int>(); } // expected-error
> {{no member named '~Y'}}
> + void h1(Y<int> *p) { p->~G<int>(); }
> + void h2(Y<int> *p) { f(p); }
> + namespace N { template<typename T> struct G {}; }
> + void h3(N::G<int> *p) { p->~G<int>(); }
> + void h4(N::G<int> *p) { f(p); } // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
> + }
> +
> + namespace TemplateUndeclared {
> + template<typename T> struct Y {};
> + // FIXME: Formally, this is ill-formed before we hit any
> instantiation,
> + // because we aren't supposed to treat the '<' as introducing a
> template
> + // name.
> + template<typename T> void f(T *p) { p->~G<int>(); } // expected-error
> {{no member named 'G'}}
> + template<class U> using G = Y<U>;
> + void h1(Y<int> *p) { p->~G<int>(); }
> + void h2(Y<int> *p) { f(p); } // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
> + namespace N { template<typename T> struct G {}; }
> + void h3(N::G<int> *p) { p->~G<int>(); }
> + void h4(N::G<int> *p) { f(p); }
> + }
> +}
>
> diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
> b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
> index 3e7f506040a6..07dd41bfe27b 100644
> --- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
> +++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
> @@ -142,8 +142,7 @@ namespace PR9449 {
>
> template <typename T>
> void f() {
> - int s<T>::template n<T>::* f; // expected-error{{implicit
> instantiation of undefined template 'PR9449::s<int>'}} \
> - // expected-error{{no member named 'n'}}
> + int s<T>::template n<T>::* f; // expected-error{{implicit
> instantiation of undefined template 'PR9449::s<int>'}}
> }
>
> template void f<int>(); // expected-note{{in instantiation of}}
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
