kadircet added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/TUScheduler.cpp:623
   std::string TaskName = llvm::formatv("Update ({0})", Inputs.Version);
   auto Task = [=]() mutable {
     auto RunPublish = [&](llvm::function_ref<void()> Publish) {
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> sammccall wrote:
> > this function is getting too long/monolithic, we should find a way to split 
> > it up.
> > ASTTask should be a member function, I think.
> I also lost track of the control flow halfway through the function, and can't 
> work it out.
> I don't know really what to concretely advise, but it needs to be a lot 
> simpler, maybe by finding some better abstractions or just better 
> understanding conceptually what this is doing.
> ASTTask should be a member function, I think.

Moved it into a meber named `publishDiagnostics`


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/TUScheduler.cpp:693
+        std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(Mutex);
+        // LatestPreamble might be the last reference to old preamble, do not
+        // trigger destructor while holding the lock.
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> Didn't we decide to make this available only after building the golden AST 
> and publishing diagnostics?
as discussed offline, this is harmless since it is being executed on ASTWorker 
thread and makes new preamble available to code completion/signature help 
faster.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D76725/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D76725



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to