sammccall added a comment.

In D76696#1944625 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76696#1944625>, 
@hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:

> All of them appear to have unresolved names in constexpr evaluation. It is 
> likely to be the same issue.


The general scheme is probably common: unresolved expr -> ??? -> an expression 
is dependent but not marked as such -> constant evaluation crashes.

But the ??? matters, as that's where the fix is.
In the case above: expr is used in a member of X, and X is not a dependent 
type, so sizeof(X) is not considered dependent


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D76696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D76696



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to