hokein marked an inline comment as done.
hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp:709
} SwitchDiagnoser(Cond);
+ // The TypoExpr might be corrected to a non-intergral-or-enum type in the
+ // later stage without the proper type check, which is invalid for switch
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> How do we know Cond is a TypoExpr directly rather than containing one?
>
> I think the usual strategy when code can't deal with typo correction being
> delayed further is to call CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr.
no sure whether we should consider the containing-typo Cond, we might still
want to keep the typo correction? thinking a case like
`switch(return_int(typo-expr)) {}`.
Do you suggest that we use the `CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr` to check the whether
Cond is/has a TypoExpr? `CorrectDelayedTyposInExpr` has a side effect of
emitting the typo-suggestion diagnostic.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76592/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76592
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
