baloghadamsoftware marked an inline comment as done.
baloghadamsoftware added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ContainerModeling.cpp:713
+  StringRef Name;
+  if (const auto *DRE = dyn_cast<DeclRefExpr>(ContE->IgnoreParenCasts())) {
+    Name = DRE->getDecl()->getName();
----------------
baloghadamsoftware wrote:
> NoQ wrote:
> > Hmm, i think you should instead look at `ContReg`, i.e. whether it's a 
> > non-anonymous `VarRegion` or a `FieldRegion` or something like that (in 
> > other patches as well). It would work more often and it'll transparently 
> > handle references.
> Unfortunately it is a `SymRegion` so it does not work :-( (Even using 
> `getMostDerivedRegion()` does not help.)
You mean the first checking form `SymbolicRegion`, then get its symbol, check 
for `SymbolRegionValue`, then get its `TypedValueRegion`, check for 
`DeclRegion` and use its `Decl`? This sound waaay more complicated and less 
readable. I am not sure which are the side cases: is it always 
`SymbolicRegion`? Is the `Symbol` of `SymbolicRegion` always a 
`SymbolRegionValue`? Is ithe `TypedValueRegion` (the return value of its 
`getRegion()`) always a `DeclRegion`?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D73720/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D73720



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to