sammccall added a comment.
Thanks! Just a couple of Qs...
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/FindTarget.cpp:105
+ if (auto *ET = T->getAs<EnumType>()) {
+ LookupInDecl = ET->getDecl();
+ } else {
----------------
Is this the bit that "breaks" the dependence? getDecl() works even if the type
might ultimately correspond to a different decl?
It's not obvious to me where the magic happens, so wherever it is, maybe add a
comment :-)
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/FindTarget.cpp:105
+ if (auto *ET = T->getAs<EnumType>()) {
+ LookupInDecl = ET->getDecl();
+ } else {
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> Is this the bit that "breaks" the dependence? getDecl() works even if the
> type might ultimately correspond to a different decl?
>
> It's not obvious to me where the magic happens, so wherever it is, maybe add
> a comment :-)
The actual lookup doesn't do anything subtle in this case (no dependent base
lookup, failing to match IsArrow isn't possible).
What do you think about just calling Decl->lookup() here and early returning,
not bothering with the generalization of lookupDependentName? (I find the mix
of behavior in that function a little hard to get my head around)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76103/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D76103
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
