rjmccall added a comment. I'm fine with people developing a proposal for this openly, but it needs to be said that language changes cannot just be made in open-source; they have to go through the official language review process, which for Objective-C is an internal committee within Apple.
The summary calls this `objc_direct_protocol`, but it's `objc_static_protocol` in the patch. I agree that "direct" isn't a great name for this. `static` is complicated, because while we use "static" vs. "dynamic" this way when we're talking *about* languages, I'm not sure any of the umpteen language uses of `static` ever use it in exactly this way, and it's possibly quite confusing to add one. Throwing out other names here: `objc_non_runtime_protocol`? `objc_compiler_only_protocol`? The technical content of the patch seems fine. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75574/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75574 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
