hfinkel added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17993#370793, @chandlerc wrote:
> If we're not going to fully implement "fdelete-null-pointer-checks" we > shouldn't claim to... I'm really worried about us accepting that flag and not > actually honoring it. > > However, I *do* think this should be guarded by a flag, and it should be > specific to the 'this' pointer. And I'm also sufficiently terrified of this > that I think the flag should be off to start with so that folks can find out > how bad this is really going to be... I agree with you, but I don't really understand why this particular use of nonnull is scary. Do you really think we have people calling member functions on null pointers on purpose and checking for a null this pointer in their code? http://reviews.llvm.org/D17993 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
