Anastasia added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/SemaOpenCL/nosvm.cl:9
@@ +8,3 @@
+#else
+void f(__attribute__((nosvm)) int* a); // expected-warning {{'nosvm' attribute
ignored}}
+#endif
----------------
yaxunl wrote:
> Anastasia wrote:
> > yaxunl wrote:
> > > yaxunl wrote:
> > > > Anastasia wrote:
> > > > > It seems like it makes nosvm available for C and earlier standards of
> > > > > OpenCL too?
> > > > >
> > > > > Doesn't feel right. :(
> > > > Before my change, the original behavior of Clang is to emits a warning
> > > > for any unknown GNU attribute, e.g.
> > > > unknown 'nosvm' attribute is ignored.
> > > >
> > > > Should I just emit the same warning if the language is not OpenCL or if
> > > > the language is OpenCL but the version is not 2.0? Or I should emit an
> > > > error if the language is OpenCL but the version is not 2.0?
> > > Also, ``'nosvm' attribute ignored`` is the default warning msg used in
> > > tablegen when LangOpt<"OpenCL"> is used. The following code is generated
> > > by tablegen:
> > >
> > > static bool checkOpenCLLangOpts(Sema &S, const AttributeList &Attr) {
> > > if (S.LangOpts.OpenCL)
> > > return true;
> > >
> > > S.Diag(Attr.getLoc(), diag::warn_attribute_ignored) << Attr.getName();
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Basically, if an attrib is defined for a specific language by using
> > > LangOpt<> in Attr.td, when this attr is used in other languages, the
> > > original behavior of Clang is to emit a warning like:
> > >
> > > 'nosvm' attribute ignored
> > >
> > > Do we want to fix this? Or simply don't use LangOpt<> for this attribute.
> > I am a bit confused now. So what diagnostic would Clang give if we don't
> > use LanOpt<>? Is it the same as if with LangOpt<>? Is there anything we can
> > do about CL version as well?
> >
> > I don't feel like we should modify default Clang behavior wrt attributes a
> > lot. Let's try to find the best way to use what we already have.
> For non-OpenCL programs,
>
> If we don't use LangOpt, Clang will emit warning
>
> unknown 'nosvm' attribute ignored
>
> If we use LangOpt, Clang will emit warning
>
> 'nosvm' attribute ignored
>
> If we don't want to change Clang default behavior but also don't like the
> second default warning, we should not use LangOpt.
>
> I can emit a warning for OpenCL program which version is not 2.0:
>
> 'nosvm' attribute is valid only for OpenCL 2.0
>
> and emit a warning for non-OpenCL programs
>
> unknown 'nosvm' attribute is ignored
Yes, seems like it's best not to use LangOpt actually.
So if the change is not large I would prefer the second option you proposed!
Repository:
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17861
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
