hans added a comment.

In D72911#1900091 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72911#1900091>, @sylvestre.ledru 
wrote:

> @krasimir @MyDeveloperDay @hans Looks like it is a regression from 
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D72911
>  and the fix isn't in 10.0rc2.
>  Should we take it?


Seems pretty safe. I've pushed it as 99e5b2ff9df5ca4c7fe13b63f60d953058cd9ca3 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/rG99e5b2ff9df5ca4c7fe13b63f60d953058cd9ca3>. Thanks!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72911/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72911



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D72911: clang-form... Sylvestre Ledru via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D72911: clang... Hans Wennborg via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to