baloghadamsoftware added a comment. In D75171#1893811 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75171#1893811>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Im sorry, i though we talked about internal code and we're stuck with the > checker interface -- this should definitely be solved by changing the > parameter of the `shouldRegister` function to `CheckerManager`. If you want > to emit errors for incorrect file, there is an example in > `UninitializedObjectChecker` and maybe in `GenericTaintChecker`. Sorry, but it does not work. It is impossible to use `CheckerManager` as parameter for `shouldRegisterXXX()` because `CheckerRegistry` does not have it. If I add `CheckerManager` to `CheckerRegistry` then the `printXXX()` functions will not work because they do not have `CheckerManager` at all. I tried to add `AnalyzerOptions` as a second parameter (see D75271 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75271>), but it does not help in printing error message. I need a way to solve 44998 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44998> by rejecting the checker if the option is disabled **and** printing an error message. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D75171/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D75171 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
