DmitryPolukhin added a comment.
Thank you for the comments!
================
Comment at: docs/ItaniumMangleAbiTags.rst:83
@@ +82,3 @@
+For <local-name>s all active tags used in the local part (<function-
+encoding>) are available, but not implicit tags which were not active!
+
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Replace the ! with a .
>
> Also, an example might be useful for the reader.
I'm 100% sure what exactly Stefan meant here and what is intended GCC behavior
vs observed behavior, for example:
namespace A {
inline namespace B __attribute__((abi_tag)) {
struct C { int x; };
}
}
std::string foo() {
struct E {
__attribute__((abi_tag("X")))
static A::C bar() {
// mangle as _ZZ3fooB5cxx11vEN1E3barB1XEv
// i.e. foo[abi:cxx11]()::E::bar[abi:X]()
// abi_tag 'B' is missing for bar in GCC 5.3.0
return A::C();
}
};
E::bar();
}
Perhaps we should skip this part.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D17567
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
