aaron.ballman added a comment. In D69560#1891185 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69560#1891185>, @whisperity wrote:
> @aaron.ballman @vingeldal I'll go over the findings (as I've run this on LLVM > and various other projects, a few examples are uploaded in my first comment > as HTML renders of the bug report!) soon, but I want to wait until a research > paper I have based on this topic gets a final decision. (It should happen > soon.) I also plan to refurbish D20689 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D20689> and > have it upstreamed as a "co-checker" of this (one for the interface rule, one > for the call sites, they kinda want to solve different aspects of the same > issue, let it be up for the project how much they wish to enforce). Sounds great, thank you! CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69560/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69560 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
