nickdesaulniers added a comment. In D72231#1881855 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72231#1881855>, @rjmccall wrote:
> No, I understand the pattern, but they must have already done some sort of > pass over the code to make it warning-clean when they're working with a > smaller integer type. Or do they just in practice never store smaller > integers in there, whereas it's hard to control size with an enum? Unsure. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72231/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72231 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
