cchen marked an inline comment as done.
cchen added a comment.
> Quoted Text
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:15554
+ LocatorChecker Checker;
+ if (Checker.Visit(OrigExpr)) {
+ llvm::copy(Checker.getComponents(),
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> cchen wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > cchen wrote:
> > > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > > General question about several cases. How we're going to support them?
> > > > > 1. (a ? b : c).
> > > > > 2. __builtin_choose_expr(a, b, c).
> > > > > 3. a = b.
> > > > > 4. a?:b
> > > > > 5. __builtin_convertvector(x, ty)
> > > > > 6. (int&)a
> > > > > 7. v.xy, where v is an extended vector
> > > > > 8. a.b, where b is a bitfield
> > > > > 9. __builtin_bit_cast(v, ty)
> > > > > 10. const_cast<ty &>(a)
> > > > > 11. dynamic_cast<ty &>(a)
> > > > > 12. reinterpret_cast
> > > > > 13. static_cast
> > > > > 14. typeid() (also is an lvalue).
> > > > > 15. __uuidof(*comPtr)
> > > > > 16. lambda calls
> > > > > 17. User defined literals
> > > > >
> > > > I think we could first evaluate the lvalue, and then pass the result of
> > > > `&lvalue` to device?
> > > What do you mean when you say `evaluate lvalue`? In veneral, it can be
> > > evaluated at the runtime. Do you propose to implement dyic translation?
> > > It will definetely slow down the execution on the device.
> > I mean evaluate lvalue before sending &lvalue to device. For example:
> > ```
> > int a, b;
> > b = 5;
> > #pragma omp target map(a = b) // assign b to a before sending `&(a=b)` to
> > device
> > {
> > a++;
> > }
> > ```
> > Therefore, the above example have the same semantics as this:
> > ```
> > int a, b;
> > b = 5;
> > int &c = (a=b)
> > #pragma omp target map(c)
> > {
> > a++;
> > }
> > ```
> Sure, we do this already, generally speaking. The main problem here is how to
> map the address and associate it with address on the device. We do it at the
> compile time, support of general lvalues requires runtime translation +
> special instrumentation of the device code for address translation.
- (a ? b : c).
- Error out for now, not sure what to for this one
- __builtin_choose_expr(a, b, c).
- Allow this one since we know what to send to device at compile time
- a = b.
- Sema accept this one, but need more work for codegen I think (Clang not
emit the a=b ir if "a=b" inside map/motion clause)
- a?:b
- What's the name of this kind of expression? I don't know what to do for
this one
- __builtin_convertvector(x, ty)
- not sure
- v.xy, where v is an extended vector
- not sure
- a.b, where b is a bitfield
- Error out for this one since bitfield is not addressable
- __builtin_bit_cast(v, ty)
- Error out for this one since bitfield is not addressable
- casts
- Error out if the expression inside the cast is not lvalue
- typeid() (also is an lvalue).
- I guess we can support this just like normal variable?
- __uuidof(*comPtr)
- not sure
- lambda calls
- OpenMP 5.0 spec has rules for lambda. Now not error out for sema but need
more work for codegen
- User defined literals
- error out since not addressable
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72811/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72811
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
