rsmith added a comment.
In D68896#1778193 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68896#1778193>, @kianm wrote:
> Hi, I am still seeing problems with this assertion. Could we please get a
> fix? I've posted the reduced test case and reproducible command on this
> Phabricator patch.
Are you still seeing problems? If so, please can you file a bug report? I can't
reproduce this failure with a recent Clang; I get
<stdin>:14:3: error: ambiguous partial specializations of 'Base<A, '\x01'>'
Base<A, C>::f();
^
<stdin>:7:7: note: partial specialization matches [with T = A]
class Base<T, 1> { };
^
<stdin>:10:7: note: partial specialization matches [with T = A, I = 1]
class Base<T, I> { };
^
but no assertion failure for the posted testcase.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68896/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D68896
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
