kkwli0 marked 2 inline comments as done.
kkwli0 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:216
+------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | pointer attachment
| :none:`unclaimed` |
|
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> kkwli0 wrote:
> > jdoerfert wrote:
> > > ABataev wrote:
> > > > Is this for Fortran?
> > > No also C/C++.
> > Yep, it is not Fortran only. We clarify some pointer attachment behavior
> > in 5.0.
> Could add a reference to the section in the standard?
I am not sure if this and another feature should be treated as special cases.
If it is not, we will need to add references for all the features.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72901/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72901
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
