craig.topper added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp:3381
+           "constrained mode");
+    FMulAdd = Builder.CreateCall(
+        CGF.CGM.getIntrinsic(llvm::Intrinsic::experimental_constrained_fmuladd,
----------------
kpn wrote:
> craig.topper wrote:
> > Doesn't this need to be CreateConstrainedFPCall so that the strictfp 
> > attribute is added? That will take care of adding the metadata operands too.
> Is this code tested? I ran into a bug yesterday where CreateCall was used 
> with a constrained intrinsic and the Instruction class blew up because the 
> function signature was wrong. I wasn't passing in the metadata arguments.
> 
> So, yes, it should be, and it would might make sense for the patch to have 
> test coverage that catches any other cases of this.
This code is copying the metadata arguments from the fmul intrinsic, MulOp. 
that’s the getOperand(2) and getOperand(3).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72820/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72820



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to