dexonsmith added a comment.
In D67678#1836628 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678#1836628>, @steven_wu wrote: > In D67678#1834957 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678#1834957>, @rsmith wrote: > > > In D67678#1834542 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678#1834542>, @steven_wu > > wrote: > > > > > @rsmith This also breaks macOS SDK. Can we revert this as we discuss a > > > less aggressive option? > > > > > > Do you have a timeline for how long it would take to fix the MacOS SDK? Is > > this something we could realistically aim to do in Clang 11 instead? I > > would really prefer for us to not have different defaults for Darwin versus > > everywhere else, so if waiting one release cycle is enough, that seems fine. > > > I am also not sure if we have rules about SDK compatibility for releases and > I can't say macOS SDK can definitely be fixed before clang 11 release. > @dexonsmith @arphaman might have more info. We can't comment on future releases. That said, if this is urgent, let @arphaman know and we can try to qualify internally sometime in the next few months and we can report back what issues we find. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67678 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
