martong added a comment.
In D71612#1790045 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71612#1790045>, @NoQ wrote:
> I wonder if this checker will find any misuses of placement into
> `llvm::TrailingObjects`.
I've evaluated this checker on LLVM/Clang source and it did not find any
results, though there are many placement new calls there. I think this is good,
because there are no false positives.
[INFO 2019-12-21 00:15] - ----==== Summary ====----
[INFO 2019-12-21 00:15] - Successfully analyzed
[INFO 2019-12-21 00:15] - clangsa: 2975
[INFO 2019-12-21 00:15] - Failed to analyze
[INFO 2019-12-21 00:15] - clangsa: 2
The two failures are caused by non existing `.inc` files, e.g.:
/mnt/ssd/egbomrt/WORK/llvm1/git/llvm-project/llvm/unittests/Option/OptionParsingTest.cpp:23:10:
fatal error: 'Opts.inc' file not found
#include "Opts.inc"
^~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71612/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71612
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
