aaron.ballman added a comment. > What do you think? Is this reasonable or do you have any alternative ideas?
This seems like a very specialized attribute for the static analyzer and I'm not certain how much utility it adds, but that may be because I don't understand the analyzer requirements sufficiently yet. It seems as though this attribute is intended to suppress diagnostics within a certain function for a certain check, much like `gsl::suppress` does for the C++ Core Guidelines. Is that correct? If so, perhaps we should just reuse that attribute (but with a different spelling)? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D72018/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D72018 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
