teemperor added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CodeGenObjC/direct-method.m:196
+@implementation Foo (Cat)
+// CHECK-LABEL: define hidden i32 @"\01-[Foo(Cat) directMethodInCategory]"(
+- (int)directMethodInCategory {
----------------
MadCoder wrote:
> aprantl wrote:
> > MadCoder wrote:
> > > this may be questionable as a chosen mangling. it's exactly what dynamic
> > > dispatch does, but because a direct method cannot have clashes on the
> > > same class, this extra namespacing is not useful and is likely making the
> > > life of debuggers harder for expression evaluation.
> > >
> > > @aprantl should I generate `@"\01-[Foo directMethodInCategory]"` instead?
> > > if yes I'd rather do it in this review
> > @teemperor implemented the LLDB support. I would assume that changing it to
> > Foo without the category will be necessary for LLDB to find it. @teemperor
> > Can you add an LLDB test for this scenario?
> that was my expectation as well, let me update the code to do so then :)
Added a test for that in 29bd2194979c50097edb39a4beb714bff8c153a1
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71694/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71694
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
