reames added a comment. In D70157#1788025 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157#1788025>, @jyknight wrote:
> > .push_align_branch_boundary [N,] [instruction,]* > > I'd like to raise again the possibility of using a more general region > directive to denote "It is allowable to add prefixes/nops before instructions > in this region if the assembler wants to", as I'd started discussing in > https://reviews.llvm.org/D71238#1786885 (but let's move the discussion here). James, I think this proposal is increasing the scope of this proposal too much. It also ignores some of the use cases identified and described in the writeup (i.e. the scoped semantics). I'm open to discussing such a feature more generally, but I'd prefer to see a more narrowly focused feature immediately. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70157 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
