lhames added a comment. In D71397#1784325 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71397#1784325>, @teemperor wrote:
> I would prefer landing this as-is because it is just doing the same we do in > other places in LLVM. Afterwards migrating the whole RTTI system in LLVM to a > new system (whether that will be D39111 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D39111> or > just a ClassID type) sounds good to me. Yep -- To be clear I didn't raise D39111 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D39111> as an objection to this approach, just as a matter of interest. As you noted it should be easy to switch later. Repository: rC Clang CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71397/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71397 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
