gchatelet added a comment. In D71213#1779841 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71213#1779841>, @foad wrote:
> @gchatelet in general would it be possible to make changes like this in a > backwards-compatible way, or in two stages without a "flag day" change? We > have out-of-tree users of CreateMemSet and it's awkward to change them all at > exactly the same time as we merge in this change from upstream llvm, and we > have had the same problem with other MaybeAlign changes recently. I realise > that LLVM doesn't make any official promises about API stability. Thx for letting me know @foad . I'll make sure to keep the old API with a deprecation message from now on. Do you have any other suggestions on how to make this less painful for out-of-tree users? I'm afraid that the cleanup phase (removal of deprecated function) will be disruptive as well. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D71213/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D71213 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
