pxli168 added inline comments. ================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:5725 @@ +5724,3 @@ + // Pipes can only be passed as arguments to a function. + if (getLangOpts().OpenCL && getLangOpts().OpenCLVersion >= 200 && + R->isPipeType()) { ---------------- Anastasia wrote: > Remove 'getLangOpts().OpenCLVersion >= 200'. Parser will only allow pipe for > CL2.0. Ideally we don't need to check getLangOpts().OpenCL either, but might > be good to leave it for documentation purposes. > > However could we merge with the previous: > if (getLangOpts().OpenCL) { > if (...) ... // image type > if (...) ... // pipe type > } Ok, it should be more clear.
================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:10768 @@ -10746,1 +10767,3 @@ + // OpenCL v2.0 s6.9b2 - An image type cannot be used to declare a variable, a + // structure or union field, an array of images, a pointer to an image, or the ---------------- Anastasia wrote: > Here you only check the pointer and not the other bits. So please modify the > comment according to what the code does. > > Does the same restriction apply to other OpenCL types i.e. sampler, event, > queue, etc? Good suggestion. I will have a look and try to add them. ================ Comment at: test/CodeGenOpenCL/opencl_types.cl:39 @@ -38,3 @@ - -void __attribute__((overloadable)) bad1(image1d_t *b, image2d_t *c, image2d_t *d) {} -// CHECK-LABEL: @{{_Z4bad1P11ocl_image1dP11ocl_image2dS2_|"\\01\?bad1@@\$\$J0YAXPE?APAUocl_image1d@@PE?APAUocl_image2d@@1@Z"}} ---------------- Anastasia wrote: > Could you please not remove this mangling test as it's not being tested > elsewhere. > > You can remove * from parameters though! OK, I will try to make this mangle right for different target. ================ Comment at: test/SemaOpenCL/invalid-pipes-cl2.0.cl:9 @@ -8,1 +8,3 @@ } +void test4() { + pipe int p; // expected-error {{pipe can only be used as a function parameter}} ---------------- yaxunl wrote: > Do we have a test for diagnosing pipe type for OCL < 2.0 ? We have one called test/SemaOpenCL/pipes-1.2-negative.cl http://reviews.llvm.org/D17437 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits