hokein accepted this revision.
hokein added inline comments.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp:220
+ bool VisitOverloadExpr(OverloadExpr *E) {
+ if (!E->decls().empty())
+ return true; // handled by findExplicitReferences.
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> hokein wrote:
> > IIUC, if the decls don't have the same kind, we will not highlight it
> > (previously, we fall back to `DependentName`).
> You're right. I don't think highlighting as dependent name is any better than
> not highlighting at all in that case, though.
> Therefore, I would argue it's not worth adding more code to handle this
> corner case (I'm not even sure it's possible in practice, it'll take quite
> some time to come up with examples like these)
I thought it is better to highlight it rather than not highlighting, but I
agree with you, it may be not worth handling this edge case.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69673/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69673
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
