If you merge this, you also need to merge the small follow up "r261301 - Fix SemaTemplate/instantiate-field.cpp after r261297." On Feb 19, 2016 11:26 AM, "Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits" < cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Ismail Donmez via cfe-commits > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Nico Weber via cfe-commits > > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Author: nico > >> Date: Thu Feb 18 19:52:46 2016 > >> New Revision: 261297 > >> > >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=261297&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Implement the likely resolution of core issue 253. > >> > >> C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even > for > >> classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit > default > >> constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be > required." > >> > >> clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, > and e.g. > >> libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer > versions. This > >> change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> > v;' again > >> when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG > >> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284). > >> > >> Fixes PR23381. > > > > Since nearly all Linux distros now ship gcc5, it would be nice to have > > this fix in 3.8 release. > > Richard, what do you think? > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
