On 2/19/2016 8:36 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via cfe-commits wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:39:29PM +0000, Ben Craig via cfe-commits
wrote:
Unfortunately, I have no access to an AIX machine to build with, so
this change has been made blind.
Any reason why this is not using "new" and "delete"? I think I would
prefer to not define uselocale, but that can be left until later.
Joerg
For now, I'm just shuffling functionality around. The old code used
calloc and free, so this rearranged code uses calloc and free.
Soon, I will be renaming uselocale to _CXX_uselocale. On platforms that
natively have uselocale, _CXX_uselocale will be #define'd to uselocale.
On platforms like AIX, _CXX_uselocale will be some function.
As for changing calloc and free to new and delete... I'm in favor of
that, but I'm not the right person to do it. I'm already nervous enough
doing mechanical shuffling of code without being able to compile the
results.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
