Hello Nemanja,

> a commit to a project that shouldn't trigger builds on a libcxx bot (i.e. the 
> change was in llvm).

With all due respect, this does not sound right.
I'm not sure how changes in a code a particular bot builds and tests
should not trigger builds. In many cases this will lead to false blame
lists, which is very annoying for developers, and hurt a quality of a
bot. Could somebody elaborate a valid use case for this, please? If
this is what Diana meant, of course.

> I have a somewhat orthogonal but related question. In the past, commits to 
> compiler-rt did not trigger builds on llvm/clang/sanitizer bots. Has this 
> behaviour been rectified with the move to github?

Before the move we had a set of schedulers with manually specified
list of projects to listen and assigned per group of bots. This was an
error prone as people were adding bots without realizing that a group
they add a bot to does not listen for a changes in some of the
projects that particular bot depends on. You have mentioned an example
of such issues.

Now we use the dependency list for each of the monorepo-ready build
factory (depends_on_projects param) to figure out what changes should
trigger a build, as well as to configure the "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="
cmake arg. The dependency list could be redefined per builder, if for
any reason a build factory default doesn't work well. All the
schedulers are configured automatically and every bot is served with
changes to any and all projects it claims a dependency on. This should
give a better and transparent way to define and track what would and
what would not trigger a build. This is the idea at least. Some work
remains to be done as not all of the build factories let redefine the
dependency list yet, not all set "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=" properly,
and such.

Thanks

Galina

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 5:09 PM Nemanja Ivanovic
<nemanja.i....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think what she is referring to was that the build seemed to be triggered by 
> a commit to a project that shouldn't trigger builds on a libcxx bot (i.e. the 
> change was in llvm).
>
> I have a somewhat orthogonal but related question. In the past, commits to 
> compiler-rt did not trigger builds on llvm/clang/sanitizer bots. Has this 
> behaviour been rectified with the move to github? I am really sorry if you 
> already answered this question and I just missed it.
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:37 PM Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev 
> <llvm-...@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Diana,
>>
>> It is not clear from your description of what is the problem. Could
>> you elaborate, please?
>>
>> I have looked at the build history closer and see that this build
>> configuration depends on libcxx, libcxxabi, libunwind, llvm projects,
>> and changes to any of these would trigger a build. Depending on a bot
>> performance, patches could be grouped to a longer blame list. To me,
>> this is exactly how it supposedly should be. Are you missing any
>> particular changes in libcxx, libcxxabi,or libunwind project which
>> should trigger a build but they didn't? If so, could you point me to
>> such change, please?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Galina
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 5:16 AM Diana Picus <diana.pi...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Galina,
>> >
>> > It seems that our libcxx bots are now triggering builds for any changes to 
>> > llvm:
>> > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux/builds/2434
>> >
>> > Should I file a bug report for this?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Diana
>> >
>> > On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 11:36, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits
>> > <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello everyone,
>> > >
>> > > The staging master is ready to accept bots from the list I have sent 
>> > > yesterday. Don't wait too long.
>> > >
>> > > The master has been updated and works with both SVN and Github monorepo 
>> > > now.
>> > >
>> > > The following builders are already listening for changes in monorepo and 
>> > > building monorepo. More are coming.
>> > >
>> > > * clang-sphinx-docs
>> > > * clang-tools-sphinx-docs
>> > > * clang-x86_64-linux-abi-test
>> > > * clang-lld-x86_64-2stage
>> > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > > * libcxx-sphinx-docs
>> > > * libunwind-sphinx-docs
>> > > * lld-sphinx-docs
>> > > * lld-x86_64-darwin13
>> > > * lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast
>> > > * lldb-sphinx-docs
>> > > * llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast
>> > > * llvm-clang-x86_64-win-fast <<-- ?
>> > > * llvm-sphinx-docs
>> > > * clang-x86_64-debian-fast
>> > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > > * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions
>> > >
>> > > A friendly reminder. If your bots are using one of these build 
>> > > factories, you would need either update your build configurations to use 
>> > > one of the currently supported build factories, or port that factory to 
>> > > work with github and monorepo.
>> > >
>> > > * LLVMBuilder (3 bots)
>> > > * PollyBuilder (3 bots)
>> > > * LLDBBuilder (6 bots)
>> > > * SanitizerBuilder (10 bots)
>> > > * CUDATestsuiteBuilder (1 bot) - depends on 
>> > > ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory
>> > > * AOSPBuilder (1 bot) - depends on PollyBuilder
>> > > * AnnotatedBuilder (2 bots)
>> > > * OpenMPBuilder (2 bots)
>> > > * FuchsiaBuilder (1 bot)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > >
>> > > Galina
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:05 AM Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> 
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hello build bot owners!
>> > >>
>> > >> The staging master is ready. Please feel free to use it to make sure 
>> > >> your bots would work well with the monorepo and github.
>> > >>
>> > >> The following builders could be configured to build monorepo:
>> > >>
>> > >> * clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel
>> > >> * clang-native-arm-lnt-perf
>> > >> * clang-cmake-armv7-lnt
>> > >> * clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon
>> > >> * clang-cmake-armv7-quick
>> > >> * clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel
>> > >> * clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost
>> > >> * clang-cmake-aarch64-quick
>> > >> * clang-cmake-aarch64-lld
>> > >> * clang-cmake-aarch64-global-isel
>> > >> * clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt
>> > >> * clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage
>> > >> * clang-ppc64le-linux-lnt
>> > >> * clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage
>> > >> * clang-ppc64be-linux
>> > >> * clang-ppc64le-linux
>> > >> * clang-s390x-linux
>> > >> * clang-s390x-linux-multistage
>> > >> * clang-s390x-linux-lnt
>> > >> * clang-hexagon-elf
>> > >> * clang-cmake-x86_64-avx2-linux
>> > >> * clang-cmake-x86_64-avx2-linux-perf
>> > >> * clang-cmake-x86_64-sde-avx512-linux
>> > >> * clang-solaris11-amd64
>> > >> * clang-x64-ninja-win7
>> > >> * clang-solaris11-sparcv9
>> > >> * clang-cmake-armv7-full
>> > >> * clang-cmake-thumbv7-full-sh
>> > >> * clang-cmake-armv8-lld
>> > >> * clang-cmake-aarch64-full
>> > >> * clang-armv7-linux-build-cache
>> > >> * clang-aarch64-linux-build-cache
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx03
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx11
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx14
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx17
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx2a
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-32bit
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-asan
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-ubsan
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-msan
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-ubuntu
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-tsan
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc5-cxx11
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-gcc-tot-latest-std
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv7-linux
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv7-linux-noexceptions
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-armv8-linux-noexceptions
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux-noexceptions
>> > >> * ppc64le-lld-multistage-test
>> > >>
>> > >> These builders are already on the staging master. So, please ping me if 
>> > >> you would like to configure any of them to work with monorepo:
>> > >>
>> > >> * clang-freebsd11-amd64
>> > >>
>> > >> These builders have been already tested and could be reconfigured 
>> > >> without staging as soon as public master is ready:
>> > >>
>> > >> * llvm-sphinx-docs
>> > >> * clang-sphinx-docs
>> > >> * clang-tools-sphinx-docs
>> > >> * lld-sphinx-docs
>> > >> * lldb-sphinx-docs
>> > >> * libcxx-sphinx-docs
>> > >> * libunwind-sphinx-docs
>> > >> * clang-x86_64-debian-fast
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian-noexceptions
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > >> * libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian
>> > >> * lld-x86_64-darwin13
>> > >> * lld-x86_64-win7
>> > >> * llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-ubuntu-fast
>> > >> * llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast
>> > >> * clang-x86_64-linux-abi-test
>> > >> * clang-with-lto-ubuntu
>> > >> * clang-with-thin-lto-ubuntu
>> > >> * llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win
>> > >> * llvm-clang-x86_64-win-fast
>> > >> * lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast
>> > >> * clang-lld-x86_64-2stage
>> > >> * lld-perf-testsuite
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks for your patience and help!
>> > >>
>> > >> Galina
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:04 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistan...@gmail.com> 
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Hello everyone,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The build bot is almost ready to move to github.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> As the next step we would migrate the staging master to listen for the 
>> > >>> both changes, from SVN as it was before, and from github.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Tonight I am going to update the staging (aka silent) master and it 
>> > >>> will start working with github.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I will send an email when it is done.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> If you bots use one of the ported build factories from the list in my 
>> > >>> previous e-mail, please feel free to stage them for working with 
>> > >>> monorepo/github and once you are happy, let me know, and I'll 
>> > >>> configure them accordingly on the production master. Once that's done, 
>> > >>> you could move the bots back to the production master and you are done.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> When you stage your bot, please follow these steps:
>> > >>> 1. Stop your bot between builds, if possible,
>> > >>> 2. Remove the bot working directory (usually this directory has a 
>> > >>> builder name and is under directory where your bot is installed; if 
>> > >>> you are not sure, check the 'builddir' param of your bot in 
>> > >>> zorg/buildbot/osuosl/master/config/builders.py),
>> > >>> 3. Edit buildbot.tac in the directory where your bot is installed. 
>> > >>> Change "port = 9990" line to "port = 9994". Save the change.
>> > >>> 4. Start your bot, make sure it connects to the staging master.
>> > >>> 5. Send me a mail with the staged bot names.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Once you are happy with your bot building monorepo changes from 
>> > >>> github, please send me an e-mail and I'll respond with the 
>> > >>> instructions of how to get your bot back to production.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Please be aware that staging master could restart often. Please let me 
>> > >>> know if you are having long running builds.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Feel free to ask if you have questions.
>> > >>> Please me know if you will see issues with the staging master.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Galina
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 6:16 PM Galina Kistanova 
>> > >>> <gkistan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Hello everyone,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> We are in the middle of porting the majority of zorg to 
>> > >>>> GitHub/monorepo. The following build factories will be ported and if 
>> > >>>> you use one of those for your bots, you are all covered:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeBuildFactory (31 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeGCSBuildFactory (2 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * LibcxxAndAbiBuilder (23 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * SphinxDocsBuilder (7 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * UnifiedTreeBuilder (11 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * ABITestsuitBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * ClangLTOBuilder (2 bots) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * LLDPerformanceTesuiteBuilder (1 bot) - based on UnifiedTreeBuilder
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Some build factories will be deprecated. If you use one of these, 
>> > >>>> please change your bot to use something else instead. Here is the 
>> > >>>> list of deprecated build factories:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory (0 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * LLDBuilder (0 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * ClangAndLLDBuilder (0 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> However, some special build factories and build factories with a few 
>> > >>>> bots would need your attention.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Here is the list of build factories in need of porting. Patches are 
>> > >>>> welcome.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * LLVMBuilder (3 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * PollyBuilder (3 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * LLDBBuilder (6 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * SanitizerBuilder (10 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * CUDATestsuiteBuilder (1 bot) - depends on 
>> > >>>> ClangBuilder.getClangBuildFactory
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * AOSPBuilder (1 bot) - depends on PollyBuilder
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * AnnotatedBuilder (2 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * OpenMPBuilder (2 bots)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> * FuchsiaBuilder (1 bot)
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Please feel free to ask if you have questions.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Thanks
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Galina
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > cfe-commits mailing list
>> > > cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>> > > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-...@lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to