aaron.ballman added a comment.
In D69145#1720254 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69145#1720254>, @poelmanc wrote:
> What do @malcolm.parsons, @alexfh, @hokein, @aaron.ballman, @lebedev.ri think
> of @mgehre's suggestion to enable `IgnoreBaseInCopyConstructors` as the
> default setting, so gcc users won't experience build errors and think
> "clang-tidy broke my code!"
>
> I could go either way and appreciate any input.
I think GCC is being overly pedantic, but I don't see much harm in enabling the
option by default.
================
Comment at:
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/readability/RedundantMemberInitCheck.cpp:60
+ if (IgnoreBaseInCopyConstructors && ConstructorDecl->isCopyConstructor() &&
+ Init->isBaseInitializer()) {
+ return;
----------------
You should elide the braces here per our coding standard.
Repository:
rCTE Clang Tools Extra
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69145/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69145
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
