ilya-biryukov accepted this revision.
ilya-biryukov marked 2 inline comments as done.
ilya-biryukov added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/tweaks/DefineInline.cpp:339
+
+ const tooling::Replacement SemiColonToFuncBody(SM, *SemiColon, 1,
+ *QualifiedBody);
----------------
s/SemiColon/Semicolon
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/refactor/tweaks/DefineInline.cpp:323
+
+ auto SemiColon = getSemicolonForDecl(Target);
+ if (!SemiColon) {
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> NIT: s/SemiColon/Semicolon
This one is still there.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/TweakTests.cpp:1332
+ template <>
+ void fo^o<char>(char p) {
+ return;
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> ilya-biryukov wrote:
> > How is this test different from the previous one?
> > Is it just trying to make sure we don't always move to the first function
> > body?
> yes that's the point, adding a comment.
Thanks!
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/TweakTests.cpp:1374
+ )cpp");
+}
+
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> ilya-biryukov wrote:
> > Do we test the following case anywhere?
> > ```
> > template <class T> void foo();
> > template <> void ^foo<int>() { // should not be available
> > return;
> > }
> > ```
> Yes, there is once check in availability tests for:
> ```
> EXPECT_UNAVAILABLE(R"cpp(
> template <typename T> void foo();
>
> template<> void f^oo<int>() {
> })cpp");
> ```
Ah, nice, I missed it. Thanks for pointing it out.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66647/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66647
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
