jrtc27 added a comment. In D54214#1718043 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D54214#1718043>, @simoncook wrote:
> Ping, before I rebased this did anyone have any other thoughts on flag > precedence? The precedence seems sensible; it's what MIPS is doing for -mabi vs -target just above. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp:541 + // If target is RISC-V adjust the target triple according to + // provided architecture name + A = Args.getLastArg(options::OPT_march_EQ); ---------------- Missing a full-stop here Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D54214/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D54214 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
