aaron.ballman added a comment. In D68377#1693490 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68377#1693490>, @xbolva00 wrote:
> It is not very obvious for me what kind of test should be done here. I > would be grateful if you could show me an example in tree. I was thinking of something in CodeGen, like CodeGen/builtin-memfns.c > Exactly for -fno-builtin-memccpy case? That would be another good test case. ================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/Builtins.def:483 BUILTIN(__builtin_memcpy, "v*v*vC*z", "nF") +BUILTIN(__builtin_memccpy, "v*v*vC*iz", "nF") BUILTIN(__builtin_memmove, "v*v*vC*z", "nF") ---------------- xbolva00 wrote: > aaron.ballman wrote: > > GCC doesn't seem to have `__builtin_memccpy`? https://godbolt.org/z/jbthQ3 > Ok, I will drop it. If you drop it, won't that lose the builtin? I was mostly thinking it's in the wrong part of the list of builtins. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D68377/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D68377 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
