ilya-biryukov added a comment. In D66647#1686021 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66647#1686021>, @kadircet wrote:
> So currently AST doesn't store any information regarding template parameter > locations except the deepest one. > Therefore I've changed the availability to discard any methods inside > templated classes, since there is no way to > validate the template parameter names. Hopefully this should be a rare > use-case, and I believe most of the times > people have same template paramater names on declaration and definition. Let > me know what you think about > it. Thanks! LG, I also think this should be a rare case. The deepest template parameters are typically the only ones anyway. > In addition to that implemented renaming for function parameters and template > parameters in case of templated > functions. Thanks, will take a look! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66647/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66647 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
