lildmh marked an inline comment as done.
lildmh added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:14805
+ if (!Type->isStructureOrClassType() && !Type->isUnionType() &&
+ (MapperIdScopeSpec.isSet() || MapperId.getAsString() != "default")) {
+ SemaRef.Diag(Loc, diag::err_omp_mapper_wrong_type);
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> lildmh wrote:
> > ABataev wrote:
> > > Why need an additional check for scope and not "default" id? I don't see
> > > this additional requirement in the standard.
> > It's because every variable in map clauses will check this, including those
> > are not struct, class, or union.
> >
> > Using this, e.g., mapping an integer won't report error that it doesn't
> > have a mapper.
> Maybe just move the check to the end of the function?
It will do some additional useless work if I move it to the end. I don't think
it is necessary to move it back.
But if you believe it's better, I can do it.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67978/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67978
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
