MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lib/Format/FormatToken.h:524
+    T = T->getPreviousNonComment();
+    return (T->Tok.is(tok::comma) && Tok.is(tok::identifier) &&
+            T->Next->Tok.is(tok::colon));
----------------
Manikishan wrote:
> MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> > do you think you might need
> > 
> > (T && T->Tok.is(tok::comma)......
> > 
> I have found a method `FieldDecl::isBitField() ` which check whether a 
> current field is a BitField, But `FieldDecl` is not used anywhere in 
> `lib/Format/` . I think it may not be related to Formatting and so I have to 
> modify my declaration of `isBitield()` in `FormatToken.h`. 
> Can I get suggestions whether my understanding is correct?
FieldDecl will be part of the AST tree, but clang-format doesn't use that (or 
it would need compiler arguments etc..)

Take a look at TokenAnnotator.cpp... (and try running clang-format with the 
-debug option), it may show you that the bitfield can be identified by the 
TT_BitFieldColon type rather than by a colon directly.


```
      } else if (CurrentToken && CurrentToken->is(tok::numeric_constant)) {
        Tok->Type = TT_BitFieldColon;

```




Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63062/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63062



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D63062: [cla... MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to