lebedev.ri added a comment. In D67661#1673712 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67661#1673712>, @s.egerton wrote:
> I agree inline asm is a far from optimal solution but it seems like the > lesser of two evils for now. Hm, i thought some previous patch already adds llvm ir riscv-specific intrinsics for those. > This sounds like a good idea, but we need to be able to guarantee that the > backend will be able to match to the correct instruction for all optimisation > levels before we can do that. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67661/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67661 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
