paulkirth added a comment. In D67253#1670569 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67253#1670569>, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> Layering feels weird here. > Can this be implemented as/limited to just a > `run-clang-misexpect.py` wrapper over clang itself? > That would be best IMHO. I discussed the concurrency issue with some folks who work on libTooling, notably Sam McCall & Dmitri Gribenko. This was the approach they suggested I follow. LibTooling also provides some nice mechanisms for curating compiler options, which is possible, but less than ideal to reimplement in a python script. There are probably more benefits that escape me at the moment, but that was the first one I thought of. Out of curiosity, if the concurrency issue was fixed in the compiler and the python script was removed/deprecated, would you still feel the same way? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67253/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67253 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
