beanz added a reviewer: compnerd.
beanz added a comment.

In D67585#1670433 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67585#1670433>, @mgorny wrote:

> This is really much more work than disabling the one component I don't need 
> or care for, especially when I do shared lib build and therefore the 
> additional library is entirely useless.


It is one-time effort to figure out what you "care" about, which makes me 
pretty unsympathetic to the argument that it is much more work. Further, your 
argument for building the `all` target is that you want to build-test things, 
but you have decided this library is "useless" so you don't want to build it. 
How many other things in tree do you deem "useless"?

Using `LLVM_DISTRIBUTION_COMPONENTS` is the best way (and hopefully in the 
future the only supported way) to make an arbitrary choice about what is 
meaningful to you.

I believe the fundamental direction of the build system needs to be different 
from what it has been in the past, and I've had conversations with other 
contributors that agree. My plan is to have a larger discussion at the 
Developer Meeting in October, and formulate a document describing the direction 
and guidelines for the build system. Presently the build system is growing 
along a trajectory that is unsustainable and actively harmful to its 
maintainability. My belief is that the build system should have less options, 
not more. In particular we should avoid options that conflict with other 
options creating invalid build configurations, which this patch does (see 
`CLANG_LINK_CLANG_DYLIB`). I also believe that we should not add options for 
each individual's preferred workflow, instead we need to coalesce around a more 
limited set of supported workflows. Following this direction will reduce the 
maintenance cost of the build system by making it easier and less risky to make 
changes, and it will provide a general improvement to the project by reducing 
the matrix of possible configurations that require distinct testing.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D67585/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D67585



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to