hokein added a comment. In D67172#1660469 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67172#1660469>, @ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Ok, agreed. Adding this indirection layer is probably making things a bit too > complex. I'll update the patch to clearly separate the std symbol mapping and > canonical includes. > > In D67172#1660435 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D67172#1660435>, @hokein wrote: > > > And I'm not sure whether it is possible to remove the suffix mapping > > completely -- for STL symbols it is possible, but for other symbols like > > GNU C headers, I didn't find out an automatic way to build a lookup table. > > > It's because we don't have anything similar to cppreference.com for them? > Maybe we could try scrapping man pages ? yes, cppreferences only provides symbols from C++/C standard libraries. Parsing man page is possible, but it requires some work (we have to write another tool to parse it). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D67172/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D67172 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
