hokein added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/clients/clangd-vscode/src/extension.ts:113
const semanticHighlightingFeature =
- new semanticHighlighting.SemanticHighlightingFeature();
+ new semanticHighlighting.SemanticHighlightingFeature(
+ getConfig<boolean>('semanticHighlighting'));
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
> Why not avoid calling `clangdClient.registerFeature` instead?
> Would allow to:
> - not change the `SemanticHighlightingFeature` class, keeping it simpler,
> - ensure we do not do any extra work if the feature is disabled.
good point, done.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67096/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67096
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
