dexonsmith added a reviewer: erik.pilkington. dexonsmith added a comment. This could cause a lot of churn in existing projects (especially with `static void foo()`), without giving Clang any new information. I'm wary of this.
> Zero-parameter K&R definitions specify that the function has no > parameters, but they are still not prototypes, so calling the function > with the wrong number of parameters is just a warning, not an error. Why not just directly give an error for the problematic case? We could carve out a `-W` flag (if it doesn't already exist) that warns if you incorrectly pass parameters to a function whose definition has no prototype, and then make it `-Werror`-by-default. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
