Szelethus added a comment. In D66381#1639679 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D66381#1639679>, @NoQ wrote:
> The code looks good and there seems to be a lot of test coverage :] Thank you! It would not have been possible on my own! And actually, there are a couple minor nits, such as caching the retrieved `CFGBlock` for each `ExplodedNode` (at least for the node we're calculating control dependencies for), so I'll address that soon™. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66381/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66381 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
