Author: yuanfang
Date: Wed Aug 21 13:59:16 2019
New Revision: 369578

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=369578&view=rev
Log:
Fix documentation build after rL369568

Modified:
    
clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-dynamic-static-initializers.rst

Modified: 
clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-dynamic-static-initializers.rst
URL: 
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-dynamic-static-initializers.rst?rev=369578&r1=369577&r2=369578&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- 
clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-dynamic-static-initializers.rst
 (original)
+++ 
clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-dynamic-static-initializers.rst
 Wed Aug 21 13:59:16 2019
@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ problems.
 
 Consider the following code:
 
--- code-block:: c
+.. code-block:: c
 
-int foo() {
-  static int k = bar();
-  return k;
-}
+  int foo() {
+    static int k = bar();
+    return k;
+  }
 
 When synchronization of static initialization is disabled, if two threads both 
call `foo` for the first time, there is the possibility that `k` will be double 
initialized, creating a race condition.


_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to