ilya-biryukov added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SemanticHighlighting.cpp:177 return; + if (TP->isPointerType() || TP->isLValueReferenceType()) + // When highlighting dependant template types the type can be a pointer or ---------------- jvikstrom wrote: > ilya-biryukov wrote: > > `RecursiveASTVisitor` also traverses the pointer and reference types, why > > does it not reach the inner `TemplateTypeParmType` in the cases you > > describe? > The D in `using D = ...` `typedef ... D` does not have a TypeLoc (at least > not one that is visited). Therefore we use the VisitTypedefNameDecl (line > 121) to get the location of `D` to be able to highlight it. And we just send > the typeLocs typeptr to addType (which is a Pointer for `using D = T*;`)... > > But maybe we should get the underlying type before we call addType with > TypePtr? Just a while loop on line 123 basically (can we have multiple > PointerTypes nested in each other actually?) > > Even if we keep it in addType the comment is actually wrong, because it > obviously works when for the actual "type occurrences" for `D` (so will fix > that no matter what). This recursion will just make us add more duplicate > tokens... Could we investigate why `RecursiveASTVisitor` does not visit the `TypeLoc` of a corresponding decl? Here's the code from `RecursiveASTVisitor.h` that should do the trick: ``` DEF_TRAVERSE_DECL(TypeAliasDecl, { TRY_TO(TraverseTypeLoc(D->getTypeSourceInfo()->getTypeLoc())); // We shouldn't traverse D->getTypeForDecl(); it's a result of // declaring the type alias, not something that was written in the // source. }) ``` If it doesn't, we are probably holding it wrong. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D66516/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D66516 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits