RaviNarayanaswamy added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/OpenMPSupport.rst:222-226
+| device extension | clause: reverse_offload
| :good:`done` | D52780
|
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | clause: atomic_default_mem_order
| :good:`done` | D53513
|
++------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------+--------------------------------------------+
+| device extension | clause: dynamic_allocators
| :good:`done` | D53079
|
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> Hahnfeld wrote:
> > Do we have CodeGen for this? I only remember Sema support...
> >
> > Also, `reverse_offload` is listed again below as `unclaimed`.
> We don't have codegen for this. Same for the reverse_offload and
> atomic_default_mem_order
As Alexey said codegen is not done so maybe change it to partial.
Regardng reverse_offload, it is debate able whether keep it unclaimed or make
it partial. Yes Sema is done but the hard part for which nobody has claimed
is codegen and libomptarget. At least for the getting this initial document
checked in we should keep it as unclaimed. Do you have a strong objection
against this.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64375
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
