Charusso added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp:483-504
+ if (!AnOpts.RawSilencedCheckersAndPackages.empty()) {
+ std::vector<StringRef> Checkers =
+ AnOpts.getRegisteredCheckers(/*IncludeExperimental=*/true);
+ std::vector<StringRef> Packages =
+ AnOpts.getRegisteredPackages(/*IncludeExperimental=*/true);
+
+ SmallVector<StringRef, 16> CheckersAndPackages;
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> Szelethus wrote:
> > Charusso wrote:
> > > Szelethus wrote:
> > > > Szelethus wrote:
> > > > > Szelethus wrote:
> > > > > > The reason why I suggested validating this in CheckerRegistry is
> > > > > > that CheckerRegistry is the only class knowing the actual list of
> > > > > > checkers and packages, and is able to emit diagnostics before the
> > > > > > analysis starts. This solution wouldn't work with plugin
> > > > > > checkers/packages.
> > > > > I don't see this being addressed actually?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it would be totally fine to just omit the validation part as
> > > > > I said earlier, the patch will be leaner, and cases in which we're
> > > > > using the silencing of checkers are very exotic anyways.
> > > > Also, we should probably compliment such validation by actually writing
> > > > tests for plugins.
> > > >
> > > > I've been through that process once. It isn't fun. Really-really isn't
> > > > :^) Let's just collectively agree to "forget" this :)
> > > Checker validation is in `CheckerRegistry`, configuration validation is
> > > in `parseAnalyzerConfigs()`. I have made a configuration, rather than a
> > > checker flag, so that I have not found more appropriate place and its
> > > does the job well. If it will be needed externally, I hope someone could
> > > do better.
> > Well isn't this checker validation?
> In any case, could just throw in a FIXME before commiting please? :)
@NoQ, does the `AnalyzerOptions::getRegisteredCheckers()` contain the plugins?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D66042
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
