ariccio added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D17130#349744, @craig.topper wrote:
> What's complex about the SVal constructors? I arbitrarily figured that classes that are more than twice-derived (is there a better way to say that) are complex. I don't think there was any //particularly// good reason there. http://reviews.llvm.org/D17130 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
